Alex Clift, pupil barrister at Coram Chambers, has been featured in the August edition of Family Law Journal with an insightful article examining the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Re M (A Child: Intermediaries) [2025] EWCA Civ 440.
On 10 April 2025, the Court of Appeal delivered its judgment in Re M, signalling a significant step away from the previously restrictive stance on appointing intermediaries in family proceedings. The court stressed that the fundamental question remains whether appointing an intermediary is necessary to ensure a fair hearing, rather than adhering to rigid limitations.
Alex’s article explores the evolving legal landscape surrounding intermediaries, reflecting on both recent guidance and case law.
The piece also delves into the broader issue of neurodiversity in family proceedings, scrutinising what can and should be expected from lawyers as they support vulnerable court users.
With family law practitioners already facing considerable strain, Alex asks whether the current expectations remain realistic and whether more systemic change is required.
The article does not shy away from discussing the practical challenges and limitations of appointing intermediaries, considering whether incremental adjustments are sufficient or if a more radical overhaul of the system is warranted.
Those with access to Family Law Journal via LexisNexis can read the full article here.
If you are interested in being represented by Alex, please click below
