Qualified legal representatives and the question of discharge
Two Coram Chambers barristers, Adrian Barnett-Thoung-Holland and Beth Payne, have recently contributed their expertise to Family Law Week.
Their article, “Qualified Legal Representatives: Summarising the Current Position and The Question of Discharge in Light of K v P (Criminal Solicitor as Court-Appointed QLR) [2025] EWFC 321” explores a novel issue in family law.
Understanding the QLR framework
Adrian and Beth delve into the general framework for qualified legal representatives (QLRs). They outline the roles and responsibilities QLRs hold in family proceedings, providing practical context for practitioners and parties alike. This is especially important as the use of QLRs becomes more prevalent in complex cases.
The K v P decision and its impact
The article examines the rare circumstance considered in K v P, where a QLR is also acting for a party in ongoing criminal proceedings. Adrian and Beth analyse the court’s approach to the question of whether a QLR can be discharged in such circumstances. Their discussion sheds light on the boundaries of court discretion and the protection of parties’ rights.
Expertise from experience
Adrian, who specialises in financial remedies, claims under TOLATA 1996, and Schedule 1 Children Act 1989 applications, brings a wealth of insight. Notably, Adrian appeared in the first reported decision involving a QLR in a financial remedies case, AXA v BYB [2023] EWFC 251 B. He also serves as the Finance and Divorce Content Editor for Family Law Week.
Beth, a probationary tenant at Coram Chambers, has substantial experience across financial remedies and private children work. Her perspective enriches the article’s analysis and practical guidance.
Looking ahead in family law
The piece by Adrian and Beth offers valuable guidance for legal professionals and parties navigating the evolving landscape of QLRs. As courts encounter more cases with overlapping criminal and family law issues, their insights will be increasingly relevant.
Read the full article on Family Law Week for a detailed discussion of this important decision and its implications.
