Sharing Homes and the Property Rights of Cohabitants
Current law:
Procedural aspects & worked examples
Copyright Mike
Horton October 2003-All rights reserved.
No
part of this document may be copied or used without
the written permission of the author.
1
Initial advice
1.1 Full proof: NB try not to ask leading questions
1.1.1 Who paid for what?
1.1.2 What discussions were there about ownership?
1.1.3 Were any promises made?
1.1.4 Did either party give up something?
1.2 Information/ documents:
1.2.1 office copy entries
1.2.2 transfer form
1.2.3 conveyancing file
1.2.4 mortgage statements
1.2.5 bank statements
1.3 Restriction if in sole name of other party
1.3.1 New Land Registration Act 2003 now in force
1.3.2 Cautions against dealings now abolished
1.3.3 Now you must apply for a 'restriction'
1.3.4 Land Registry guides:
1.3.4.1 Practice Guide 19: Notices, restrictions
and the protection of third party interest in the
register: see http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/publications/practice_guides/lrpg019.pdf
1.3.4.2 Practice Guide 24: Private trusts of land:
see
http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/publications/practice_guides/lrpg024.pdf
1.3.5 The Land Registry guides suggest that a person
seeking to protect an interest under a constructive
trust should apply for a restriction in form A.
This refers to the wording of the restriction which
will appear on the register.
1.3.5.1 A form A restriction reads:
"No disposition by a sole proprietor of the
registered estate (except a trust corporation) under
which capital money arises is to be registered unless
authorised by an order of the court."
1.3.5.2 This is the same restriction which will
appear whenever property is transferred into the
names of two or more persons and they hold as tenants
in common.
1.3.5.3 A form A restriction provides protection
of dubious quality. The registered proprietor would
be able to find a helpful friend to add as a joint
legal owner. The transfer into their joint names
would not be stopped by the form A restriction (as
no capital monies arise). With there now being two
registered proprietors, a sale or re-mortgage would
not now be stopped by the form A restriction, and
any interest under a constructive trust etc would
be 'overreached'.
1.3.6 So, apply for a form N restriction, which
reads thus:
"No disposition of the registered estate by
the proprietor of the registered estate is to be
registered without a written consent signed by [name]
of [address] {signed on behalf of [name] of [address]
by [representative]}"
1.3.6.1 The Land Registry Guides suggest that a
person with an interest under a bare trust should
apply for a restriction in form N.
1.3.7 See application form for restriction RX1:
these can be downloaded from the Land Registry website
at: http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/publications/lrforms/03/rx1.pdf
or in word format at: http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/publications/lrforms/03/rx1.doc
1.3.8 "The beneficiary will need to satisfy
the registrar that there is a trust. In practice,
this will involve completing panel 13 of form RX1
with sufficient information to do so. This will
involve more than a bare assertion that a trust
has arisen. You will need to explain the circumstances
that have caused it to arise."
1.3.9 The registered proprietor can object to the
restriction being entered, and a restriction may
be cancelled or withdrawn. In the event of a dispute,
the matter can be referred to the Adjudicator to
HM Land Registry - or you can always issue proceedings!
1.4 Sever joint tenancy?
1.4.1 NB on severance, proprietor to apply for form
A restriction
2 Pre-action steps
2.1 See the Practice Direction - Protocols. No specific
pre-action protocol in relation to ToLaTA claims.
2.2 But para 4 of the Practice Direction governs
'pre-action behaviour in other cases'.
2.3 NB failure to behave properly can attract costs
sanctions.
2.4 Part 36 offers
2.4.1 Detailed provisions relating to the making
of Part 36 offers and the consequences in costs
for their acceptance are to be found in Part 36
of the CPR. To be effective, a part 36 offer must:
2.4.1.1 be in writing, stating that it is a part
36 offer!
2.4.1.2 state whether it relates to the whole claim
or to part of it or to an issue that arises in it
and if so to which part or issue;
2.4.1.3 state whether it takes into account any
counterclaim;
2.4.1.4 be expressed to be open for at least 21
days after the date it was made;
2.4.1.5 be pitched below (if only slightly) the
level you expect the court to find: the costs consequences
set out in CPR 36.21 only apply where the judgment
is more advantageous than the terms of the offer.
You have to beat your offer, not just match it.
2.5 Pre-issue: check whether:
2.5.1 adequate letters of claim & response were
sent/received;
2.5.2 the parties' positions have changed since
then; if so, how?
2.5.3 the issues remaining in dispute have been
clearly identified and could be further narrowed;
2.5.4 serious attempts to settle have been made;
2.5.5 a (further) Part 36 offer should be made or
accepted now;
2.5.6 mediation/ ADR should be considered or tried
pre-issue;
2.5.7 evidence is ready or in hand;
2.5.8 arrangements are in place for service.
3 Issuing proceedings
3.1 The Part 7/ Part 8 debate
Rule 8.1 Types of claim in which Part 8 procedure
may be followed
8.1
Types of claim in which Part 8 procedure may be
followed
(1) The Part 8 procedure is the procedure set out
in this Part.
(2) A claimant may use the Part 8 procedure where-
(a) he seeks the court's decision on a question
which is unlikely to involve a substantial dispute
of fact; or
(b) paragraph (6) applies.
(3) The court may at any stage order the claim to
continue as if the claimant had not used the
Part 8 procedure and, if it does so, the court may give
any directions it considers appropriate.
(6) A rule or practice direction may, in relation
to a specified type of proceedings-
(a) require or permit the use of the Part 8 procedure;
and
(b) disapply or modify any of the rules set out
in this Part as they apply to those proceedings.
Practice Direction-How to Make Claims in Schedule
Rules and Other Claims
8BPD.1 This Practice Direction supplements
CPR Part 8, and Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 to the
CPR
1.1 In this practice direction "Schedule rules"
means provisions contained in the Schedules to the
CPR, which were previously contained in the Rules
of the Supreme Court (1965) or the County Court
Rules (1981).
8BPD.2 Contents of this Practice Direction
2.1 This practice direction explains-
(1) how to start the claims referred to in Sections
A and B;
(2) which form to use as the claim form; and
(3) the procedure which those claims will follow.
8BPD.3 How to use this Practice Direction
3.1 This practice direction is divided into Sections
A and B. Only one section will be relevant to how
tomake a particular claim.
3.2 If the claim is described in paragraph A.1-use
section A.
3.3 If the claim is described in paragraph B.1-use
section B.
8BPD.4
Section A: Application
A.1 Section A applies if-
(1) the claim is listed in Table 1 below;
(2) an Act provides that a claim or application
in the High Court is to be brought by originating
summons;
or
(3) before 26 April 1999, a claim or application
in the High Court would have been brought by originating
summons, and no other method for bringing the claim
or application on and after 26 April 1999 is specified
in a rule or practice direction.
A.2
(1) The claimant must use the Part 8 procedure unless
an Act, rule, or practice direction, makes any additional
or contrary provision.
(2) Where such additional or contrary provision
is made the claimant must comply with it and modify
the Part 8 procedure accordingly.
8BPD.5 Claim form
A.3 The claimant must use the Part 8 claim form.
3.1.1 Before the CPR, proceedings under s 30 of
the Law of Property Act 1925 and s 14 of the Trusts
of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 would
be brought by originating summons in the High Court,
and by originating application in the county courts.
This means that Section A of the Practice
Direction to Part 8 applies, which suggests that
the use of the Part 8 procedure is mandatory, even
where there is likely to be a substantial dispute
of fact.
3.1.2 However, because the rules allow the Defendant
to object to the use of the Part 8 procedure if
there is a substantial dispute of fact, be wary
of issuing under Part 8 where pre-action correspondence
indicates either a substantial dispute of fact or
a significant disagreement as to the legal framework
of the claim.
3.1.3 At one end of the spectrum, eg case with trust
deed drawn up at time of purchase, trust deed is
clear, no case of fraud or mistake has been raised
or can be foreseen: Part 8 likely to be appropriate.
3.1.4 Opposite end: cases involving eg proprietary
estoppel claims likely to benefit from clear exposition
of issues in detailed particulars of claim.
3.1.5 Are the factual issues such that full pleadings
will assist in the resolution of the dispute?
3.2 Venue:
3.2.1 High Court only if very complex or very valuable
claim (see para 2.4 of the Practice Direction to
Part 7); otherwise, county court
3.2.2 Old county court rules: proceedings to be
issued in county court for the district in which
the property is situate
3.2.3 Now, proceedings to be issued in the "defendant's
home court", ie the county court for the district
in which the defendant resides or carries on business
(CPR r 2.3(1)). Clearly, if the defendant is living
in the property which is the subject of the dispute,
this will be the same county court.
3.3 Part 8:
3.3.1 Proceedings commenced by Part 8 claim form
(n208) plus detailed witness statement filed and
served at time of issue
3.3.2 Defendant to file acknowledgment of service
and witness statement in reply
3.3.3 There will then be a first directions appointment.
Case automatically allocated to multitrack.
3.3.4 The defendant can object to the use of the
Part 8 procedure, if it appears that there will
be a substantial dispute of fact: CPR r 8.8. The
court can also raise the issue of whether the Part
8 procedure is appropriate. See r 8.1(3).
3.4 Part 7:
3.4.1 Part 7 claim form (n1) and detailed particulars
of claim
3.4.2 Defendant to file defence etc
3.4.3 Full timetable for allocation questionnaires,
disclosure etc
3.5 Evidence: s 15 checklist
3.5.1 Section 15(1) of the 1996 Act contains a checklist
of items to which the court is to have regard in
determining an application under s 14.
3.5.2 If a dispute is possible on, eg, whether or
not there should be an order for sale, evidence
will be needed on the matters set out in the checklist,
including cost of rehousing for parties if sale
ordered.